Where did the idea for I DO come from?
I remember thinking when I was asked this that it was such a beautifully straightforward question. I so wished I had a straight answer for it. But I didn’t. I read once that Tolkien said he didn’t invent Middle Earth; he discovered it. That’s sort of what happened to me with I DO. I really didn’t have any clear cut ideas when I started the book. I just had this wild urge to do a traditional gothic--it hit me all of a sudden one night, like a lightning strike. I’d never done one before, but I’d heard that Dorchester was looking for gothics, and I thought if I could pull it off I’d have a good chance of selling to them. I set it in a castle because that’s about as gothic as you can get; but I stretched the envelope a bit (okay, a lot) by putting the castle in West Texas. One of the reasons for that was simply a labor concern. I wanted to cut down my research time. And, since I live in West Texas, I figured it would make descriptions easier. If I needed to know what the climate or terrain was like, I had only to look out the window. Besides that--and this is the curious part--I had a real life example for the thing. Several years ago, my husband and I were driving to Abilene, when suddenly I spied this castle looming up out of the prairie (and, no, I hadn’t been drinking, *smile*). It was only the facade of a castle, actually, but it DID grab my attention. I heard later it was the abandoned project of some millionaire--although what he’d been planning on doing with it, I don’t know. I didn’t think much about it at the time, but it obviously hung there in my subconscious and surfaced again when I decided to write a gothic. That happens to me a lot. I’ve been called a walking encyclopedia of useless information. My mind is a storehouse of eccentric trivia that pops out into fiction when I least expect it. Even an oddity like the disintegration device featured in I DO was based on genuine historical reports of John Keeley’s experiments. (He was a 19th century Philadelphia inventor--which also explains where the character of Dr. Earnshaw came from.) I’ve learned not to do much plotting in advance because I’m never sure what’s going to arise as a story progresses. I DO, in particular, definitely had a mind of its own. Since the book was SUPPOSED to be a gothic, I set out writing it entirely from the heroine’s (Dorcas Jeffries) perspective, because that’s how a traditional gothic-romance is done. Spending that much time in Miss Jeffries’ convoluted and active brain, however, put a whole new slant on things. Early on I realized I had a comic heroine on my hands, and she flat out refused to be anything else. The book took about five months to write (four to get it all down on paper and then another one to edit, tweak and polish). By the time I’d finished I was exhausted and in the throes of a most ironic dilema. This "gothic" that I’d started purely for its marketability had metamorphised into something very different. If anything, it was a parody of a gothic. And I had no idea if something like that would sell--it seemed unlikely, in fact. I wondered if I’d "shot myself in the foot," so to speak. But that’s how the story had turned out, so that’s how I had to submit it. My original choice, Dorchester, was the first and only publisher I approached. They gave me a quick decision, and--miracle of miracles--they liked it just the way it was. The only thing they wanted to change was the title. I had called the book EYES OF THE CAT, because I was still obsessing over the gothic angle. But my editor said it was too funny for a gothic and retitled it I DO.... There must be a moral in all that somewhere, but darned if I can figure it out.
|
Get updates via email:
Subscribe to this site:
Bookmark this page:
|